Opened 5 years ago

Closed 11 months ago

#1244 closed enhancement (fixed)

Adding a comparison about I2P and RetroShare

Reported by: viha12 Owned by: slumlord
Priority: trivial Milestone:
Component: www/i2p Version: 0.9.12
Keywords: transparency docs Cc: sadie
Parent Tickets: Sensitive: no

Description

On the page https://geti2p.net/en/comparison or https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/other-networks

a short comparison about I2P and RetroShare? would be welcome (about privacy).

RetroShare? has more than 3000 simultaneous users. A major version will be released in april 2014 (v0.6 AKA "GXS").

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retroshare

Subtickets

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by str4d

Keywords: transparency docs added
Milestone: 0.9.13

comment:2 Changed 12 months ago by zzz

Cc: sadie added
Owner: set to slumlord
Status: newassigned

assigning to slumlord to investigate whether retroshare is still alive, and to update page, or not

comment:3 Changed 12 months ago by slumlord

Status: assignedinfoneeded

Looks to be actively developed,
https://github.com/RetroShare/RetroShare shows a commit of yesterday. https://retroshareteam.wordpress.com/2018/03/13/release-notes-for-v0-6-4/ last release was in March 2018.
Documentation is available at https://retroshare.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

Includes Tor-based connectivity and/or regular clearnet connectivity. Would require someone to write up a short paragraph, which I can't do at the moment as I know nothing about Retroshare, comparing it to I2P.

Edit: Retroshare isn't a network, however. It is a program that can run over anonymous networks as well as clearnet. For this reason, I am unsure if it should be included on our comparisons page.

Last edited 12 months ago by slumlord (previous) (diff)

comment:4 Changed 11 months ago by villain

Status: infoneededopen

Comparison added. This issue can be closed now.

comment:5 Changed 11 months ago by villain

Resolution: fixed
Status: openclosed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.