Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#1447 closed defect (fixed)
Class P routers
Reported by: | zzz | Owned by: | zzz |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.9.20 |
Component: | router/general | Version: | 0.9.17 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Parent Tickets: | Sensitive: | no |
Description
Have an easy checkbox on /config to set 'unlimited', say that it's for data center only (unnatted), verify by checking for interface with public IP, make bw and conn limits huge, call it class P in caps… or maybe class X, to leave room for future classes higher than O but not unlimited.
Subtickets
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 6 years ago by
My vote would be for this to be class X, with an additional class P for routers with bandwidth 256KB/s+, or possibly even 1024KB/s or more. Many home users these days have fiber to the premises or other high-bandwidth connections that provide symmetric 25-100mbps, and the number of users with these connections is growing all the time. I feel like it would be great to be able to utilize that bandwidth more effectively by adding a class that's somewhere well above the current "O," but perhaps not quite all the way to "unlimited," even if the router's bandwidth usage wouldn't actually be "unlimited" in practice.
I know that I have personally been disappointed by how little of my own very high speed home connection has been utilized for the network.
comment:3 Changed 6 years ago by
Owner: | set to zzz |
---|---|
Status: | new → accepted |
stubbed out (only) in f6ee726959d1d72b6ecb55ed17a8f5373c6433e7 0.9.17-12
comment:4 Changed 6 years ago by
Milestone: | 0.9.19 → 0.9.20 |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | accepted → closed |
P/X in 663b04c71b280e860821cfe71fa8f5f5207b0a4a 0.9.19-14. There's no checkbox as suggested in OP; it's simply class X if over 2000 KBps share bandwidth. X still has limits, but they are really high.
Larger Bloom filter checked in early in 0.9.19-x cycle - see #1505.
Closing ticket, although we may adjust the limits and thresholds later.
Also required: a max memory check, and a new bloom filter setting, as the false positive rate will get really bad over 4 MBps