Opened 4 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#1512 closed enhancement (fixed)
Jetty 9
| Reported by: | zzz | Owned by: | zzz |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 0.9.30 |
| Component: | apps/jetty | Version: | 0.9.18 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Parent Tickets: | #1902 |
Description
ref: http://zzz.i2p/topics/1727
9.2 or 9.3? 9.3.0 will be released soon.
9.3.x req'd for HTTP/2 - ticket: #1511
target late 2015 / early 2016?
May be a lot of work, but we've done it before, for 6, 7, and 8.
Requires Java 7, which we have warned we're going to require mid-2015, but don't have a target yet.
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by zzz
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by str4d
- Status changed from new to open
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
- Milestone changed from eventually to 0.9.32
- Owner set to zzz
- Status changed from open to accepted
Currently on the roadmap for late 2017. Jetty 8 is EOL. See #1902, Jetty 8 not in Debian stretch, so we may need to pull this in.
As the Debian/Ubuntu? packages contain 9.2.x, that should be our target.
Good news is that we do require Java 7 now.
Related: Upgrade from Tomcat 6 to 8.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
- Parent Tickets set to 1902
comment:5 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
Development branch is i2p.i2p.zzz.jetty9
comment:6 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
Add a subticket #1935.
comment:7 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
notes on schedule:
Tails 3.0 (mid-June) is stretch. We would need to have Jetty 9 in 0.9.30 (late April) to make it into Tails 3.0. However it looks like we'll be removed from Tails even before that for lack of a maintainer. Jetty 9 is currently in jessie-backports, but is still not in Ubuntu pre-xenial.
comment:8 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
- Milestone changed from 0.9.32 to 0.9.30
This is pretty much done. I have both standard and package builds working in my jetty9 branch. Target will be either 0.9.30 or 31, to be decided at next week's meeting.
comment:9 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
Still todo: finish and test deb builds for precise (no J9 or T8) wheezy (no J9 but has T8), trusty (no J9 or T8), and jessie (J9 in backports, T8 in std.)
Also, I may have broken the T8-but-no-J9 build that will be required for wheezy.
comment:10 Changed 2 years ago by zzz
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from accepted to closed
In 0.9.29-4
Add a subticket #1669.