Changes between Version 8 and Version 9 of OpenITPReview/Criteria


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 17, 2013 5:37:52 PM (6 years ago)
Author:
zzz
Comment:

experience

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • OpenITPReview/Criteria

    v8 v9  
    118118|| Are their significant known security concerns or has the project had public exploit(s)? || Future cryptographic weakness (see #856). No known public exploits of I2P itself ('''TODO: Check this'''). ||  ||
    119119|| Is this project implicated in the harm of an at-risk population? || No || Yes ||
    120 || Is the project written in a high-risk language like C? || Written in Java, so... no? || Maybe? ||
    121 || Is the project's development team relatively inexperienced, especially with security? || No active developers have implied having any security background or education. || Yes? ||
     120|| Is the project written in a high-risk language like C? || No (Java) || Yes ||
     121|| Is the project's development team relatively inexperienced, especially with security? || The team has a wide range of technical training and experience, ranging from college students to those with 30+ years of engineering / programming background. No active developers have indicated having any formal security background or education. || Yes? ||