Changes between Version 64 and Version 65 of faq


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 18, 2010 11:03:48 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
anonymous
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • faq

    v64 v65  
    9797
    9898 * __Isn't I2P encouraging copyright infringement?__
    99     * I2P is a network. We provide a framework for encrypted, anonymous communication. How our users choose to use these freedoms is entirely their call. Some people may feel more comfortable engaging in practices that may put them in some risk in the "wider world", such as filesharing, over I2P, but we don't explicitly take a view on this. ''We try (?)'' to ensure that publicly visible content on the network doesn't actively infringe on criminal legislation.
    100     * Note that, to date in most regimes, copyright infringement is a civil law, or tort, and not a criminal infraction.
     99    * I2P is a network. We provide a framework for encrypted, anonymous communication. How our users choose to use these freedoms is entirely their call. Some people may feel more comfortable engaging in practices that may put them in some risk in the "wider world", such as filesharing, over I2P, but we don't explicitly take a view on this. Note that, to date in most regimes, copyright infringement is a civil law, or "tort", and not a criminal infraction. As a "no trusted parties" anonymizing network, there is no mechanism within the I2P software to "turn off" sites that don't meet certain criteria. There are mechanisms built into the service to mitgate against abuse, however.
    101100
    102101 * __Criminal Activity (snuff/bestiality/cp/terrorism etc)__