Changes between Version 100 and Version 101 of specs


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 22, 2010 6:29:00 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
zzz
Comment:

claim tunnel routing

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • specs

    v100 v101  
    3131|| AES256/CBC Tunnel Message Encryption http://www.i2p2.i2p/techintro.html#op.crypto ||    ||  Mathiasdm  ||   
    3232|| Tunnels http://www.i2p2.i2p/tunnel-alt ||    ||    ||  Needs lots of work esp. on crypto - why does it say things are decrypted first and then encrypted at the end??? Very confusing -  Moved discussion and alternatives to new http://www.i2p2.i2p/tunnel_discussion
    33 || Tunnel Routing http://www.i2p2.i2p/how_tunnelrouting ||    ||     ||  Looks very old, should it be combined with the newer tunnel docs?
    3433|| Garlic Encryption ElGamal/AES + Session Tag http://www.i2p2.i2p/how_elgamalaes ||   || welt ||   
    3534|| Tunnel Building circles-and-arrows (picture) || new || dr|z3d ||   Bring me your rough graphical drafts!
     
    7675|| Threat model http://www.i2p2.i2p/how_threatmodel || in progress || smeghead || This may be helpful - or not: http://l6nvqsqivhrunqvs.tor2web.com/index.php?do=topic&id=11566
    7776|| Garlic Routing http://www.i2p2.i2p/how_garlicrouting ||    ||  zzz   ||  Looks very old, and this is a confusing term. We were challenged by the Tor guys on whether we actually do strictly what the references define as 'garlic routing'. Needs to be analyzed and either fixed, merged with other docs, or nuked. Should we use this term at all, anywhere?
     77|| Tunnel Routing http://www.i2p2.i2p/how_tunnelrouting ||    ||  zzz   ||  Looks very old, should it be combined with the newer tunnel docs?
    7878
    7979